First Control Process
- Submissions are reviewed for adherence to the guidelines outlined in the manuscript preparation section.
- Articles are checked for conformity with the specified template and scientific rigor.
- Descriptive research submissions are evaluated to ensure the inclusion of multiple variables where applicable.
- Methodology, data collection, and analysis processes are scrutinized for accuracy and validity.
- The manuscript’s potential contribution to international literature is assessed.
- A similarity check using Turnitin or iThenticate is performed, with a maximum similarity threshold of 15% and a word exclusion limit of five.
- Articles are reviewed for adherence to the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) and forwarded to the field editor only if they meet these standards.
Peer-Review Process
- Manuscripts are evaluated by at least two PhD-level experts in the field.
- Referees have 5 days to accept the review invitation, extendable by an additional 15 days if necessary.
- Upon acceptance, referees are given 15 days to complete their review, with a possible extension of 15 days.
- Review outcomes include acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection, based on referee feedback.
- In cases of conflicting reviews, a third referee may be consulted.
- The editor reviews referee comments and disregards any biased or inappropriate feedback.
- Authors are required to revise their manuscripts within 15 days, highlighting changes made and providing detailed responses to referee comments.
Publishing Process
- Upon acceptance, a publication editor is assigned for a final review.
- The language editor conducts a thorough review within 15 days and may request additional proof-reading if necessary.
- Authors make final language revisions and confirm the final version of their manuscript.
- The editor-in-chief provides final approval before assigning the article to the next available issue.
- Accepted articles are published in early view with an assigned DOI. Post-publication changes are not allowed unless significant issues are identified by authors or readers, which are reviewed and corrected as necessary.